# Machine Learning - Train/Test

## Evaluate Your Model

In Machine Learning we create models to predict the outcome of certain events, like in the previous chapter where we predicted the CO2 emission of a car when we knew the weight and engine size.

To measure if the model is good enough, we can use a method called Train/Test.

## What is Train/Test

Train/Test is a method to measure the accuracy of your model.

It is called Train/Test because you split the the data set into two sets: a training set and a testing set.

80% for training, and 20% for testing.

You *train* the model using the training set.

You *test* the model using the testing set.

*Train* the model means *create* the model.

*Test* the model means test the accuracy of the model.

## Start With a Data Set

Start with a data set you want to test.

Our data set illustrates 100 customers in a shop, and their shopping habits.

### Example

```
import numpy
```

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

numpy.random.seed(2)

x = numpy.random.normal(3, 1, 100)

y = numpy.random.normal(150, 40,
100) / x

plt.scatter(x, y)

plt.show()

### Result:

The x axis represents the number of minutes before making a purchase.

The y axis represents the amount of money spent on the purchase.

## Split Into Train/Test

The *training* set should be a random selection of 80% of the original data.

The *testing* set should be the remaining 20%.

`train_x = x[:80]`

train_y = y[:80]

test_x = x[80:]

test_y = y[80:]

## Display the Training Set

Display the same scatter plot with the training set:

### Example

```
plt.scatter(train_x,
train_y)
```

plt.show()

### Result:

It looks like the original data set, so it seems to be a fair selection:

## Display the Testing Set

To make sure the testing set is not completely different, we will take a look at the testing set as well.

### Example

```
plt.scatter(test_x,
test_y)
```

plt.show()

### Result:

The testing set also looks like the original data set:

## Fit the Data Set

What does the data set look like? In my opinion I think the best fit would be a polynomial regression, so let us draw a line of polynomial regression.

To draw a line through the data points, we use the ```
plot()
```

method of the matplotlib module:

### Example

Draw a polynomial regression line through the data points:

```
import numpy
```

import
matplotlib.pyplot as plt

numpy.random.seed(2)

x =
numpy.random.normal(3, 1, 100)

y = numpy.random.normal(150, 40, 100) / x

train_x = x[:80]

train_y = y[:80]

test_x = x[80:]

test_y =
y[80:]

mymodel = numpy.poly1d(numpy.polyfit(train_x, train_y, 4))

myline = numpy.linspace(0, 6, 100)

plt.scatter(train_x, train_y)

plt.plot(myline, mymodel(myline))

plt.show()

### Result:

The result can back my suggestion of the data set fitting a polynomial regression, even though it would give us some weird results if we try to predict values outside of the data set. Example: the line indicates that a customer spending 6 minutes in the shop would make a purchase worth 200. That is probably a sign of overfitting.

But what about the R-squared score? The R-squared score is a good indicator of how well my data set is fitting the model.

## R2

Remember R2, also known as R-squared?

It measures the relationship between the x axis and the y axis, and the value ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 means no relationship, and 1 means totally related.

The sklearn module has a method called `r2_score()`

that will help us find this relationship.

In this case we would like to measure the relationship between the minutes a customer stays in the shop and how much money they spend.

### Example

How well does my training data fit in a polynomial regression?

```
import numpy
```

from sklearn.metrics import r2_score

numpy.random.seed(2)

x = numpy.random.normal(3, 1, 100)

y = numpy.random.normal(150, 40,
100) / x

train_x = x[:80]

train_y = y[:80]

test_x = x[80:]

test_y = y[80:]

mymodel = numpy.poly1d(numpy.polyfit(train_x, train_y,
4))

r2 = r2_score(train_y, mymodel(train_x))

print(r2)

Try it Yourself »
**Note:** The result 0.799 shows that there is a OK relationship.

## Bring in the Testing Set

Now we have made a model that is OK, at least when it comes to training data.

Now we want to test the model with the testing data as well, to see if gives us the same result.

### Example

Let us find the R2 score when using testing data:

```
import numpy
```

from sklearn.metrics import r2_score

numpy.random.seed(2)

x = numpy.random.normal(3, 1, 100)

y = numpy.random.normal(150, 40,
100) / x

train_x = x[:80]

train_y = y[:80]

test_x = x[80:]

test_y = y[80:]

mymodel = numpy.poly1d(numpy.polyfit(train_x, train_y,
4))

r2 = r2_score(test_y, mymodel(test_x))

print(r2)

Try it Yourself »
**Note:** The result 0.809 shows that the model fits the
testing set as well, and we are confident that we can use the model to predict
future values.

## Predict Values

Now that we have established that our model is OK, we can start predicting new values.

### Example

How much money will a buying customer spend, if she or he stays in the shop for 5 minutes?

```
print(mymodel(5))
```

Run example »
The example predicted the customer to spend 22.88 dollars, as seems to correspond to the diagram: